The Phonological Theory Agora

Day 1 - Topics

PHONOLOGY AND THE LEXICON

This tutorial will consist of two parts.

Part I (the review) will survey the wide range of opinion concerning the contents of the lexicon in contemporary phonological theory. Questions to be addressed include the following :



• (i) Do lexical representations contain fine phonetic detail, as argued by the proponents of Exemplar Theory, or do they consist of discrete symbols, as assumed in classical modular architectures of grammar ?




• (ii) Does the lexicon store single underlying representations, in line with a long tradition dating back at least to Hockett’s "theoretical base forms", or does it rather contain sets of surface allomorphs, as asserted in certain implementations of OO-correspondence and in certain versions of Word-and-Paradigm morphology ?




• (iii) Relatedly, just what type of linguistic expressions have phonological representations in the lexicon ? Minimal morphemes ? Stems and affixes ? Words ? Larger items ?




• (iv) In theories assuming underlying representations consisting of discrete categories, what information is lexically stored ? Only phonologically unpredictable information ? Or some redundant information too ? If the latter, does this include prosody ?




Arguments over these questions turn out to draw on an extremely wide variety of evidence, including internal patterns of distribution and alternation, learnability considerations, psycholinguistic data, and processes of acquisition and change.

Part II (the debate) will focus specifically on the implications for lexical representation of patterns of multiple paradigmatic dependency : e.g. so-called "split-base formations". French prenominal adjectives provide a well-known example in non-normative masculine liaison forms such as [pÊ É™mjeÊ ] in [pÊ É™mjeÊ ami] "first friend". Here, the final consonant is predictable from the feminine form [pÊ É™mjÉ›Ê ], and the preceding vowel resembles that of the masculine citation form [pÊ É™mje]. The debate will pitch approaches to multiple paradigmatic dependencies based on OO-correspondence and lexical conservatism (Steriade 1999) against more traditional analyses relying on underlying representations (Bermúdez-Otero forthcoming).

Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo. forthcoming. In defence of underlying representations : French adjectival liaison and Romanian morphological palatalization. Probus.

Steriade, Donca. 1999. Lexical conservatism in French adjectival liaison. In J.-Marc Authier, Barbara E. Bullock & Lisa Reid (eds.), Formal perspectives on Romance linguistics : selected papers from the 28th Linguistic Symposium on Romance languages (LSRL XXVIII), University Park, 16-19 April 1998 (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 185), 243-70. Amsterdam : John Benjamins.



Day 2 - Data set
The data set and instructions for use are < style="color : #0000cd ;">here (PDF).


Schedule

Abstracts